
I wish I had an excuse to buy American postage stamps.
These stamps created by the American College of Nurse-Midwives are beautiful.
What a fabulous way to increase awareness of the midwifery option for childbirth.


Around 6:30 am mom called to let me know that her waters had release earlier that morning. Since she wasn't aware of having any contractions, yet, she decided that she wanted to wait at home to see if labour would begin on its own.
After talking with the nurses in labour and delivery the parents decided to go into the hospital around 4:00 pm so the nurses could monitor for contractions and baby's heart rate. I joined the parents at their house, where I shared a meal with dad as mom calmly continued her regular activities. Soon we headed off in the cold dark of a winter evening to the hospital.
In the assessment room I played games with an older sibling as the parents and I discussed the risks and benefits of the options that lay ahead of them. I did a little bit of acupressure on mom to see if we could encourage contractions to pick-up. The monitors recorded that she was having mild contractions, but she found no discomfort in them at all. The doctor did an internal exam and found the mom was 2 cm dilated and baby's heart rate was a healthy 135 bpm. It was clear that labour was not active yet and together we decided that the best option was to head home to eat and sleep in the comfort of our own homes. At 8:30 pm Dr. X agreed to the family's wishes to head home for the night to await labour. If nothing happened by 8 am the next day they would likely be called back to start an induction of labour. At home, I gave dad a quick lesson in applying acupressure to encourage contractions. I wished them a good nights rest, as I suspected they'd be calling me before the sun rose the next day.
At 5:42 am dad phoned me to report that mom's contractions had begun and were coming every 5 minutes. We agreed to meet at the hospital. I arrived around 6:30 am to find the parents being settle into their labour and delivery room. Mom was already 7 cm dilated and well on her way to bringing a new baby into this world.
This final stage of dilation is powerful and often overwhelming. Mom was trying to lie in the narrow hospital bed. With every contraction, however, I could see her body tense and start writhing in resistance to the power of the contractions which gripped her every couple of minutes. Dad and I gave mom our gentle and calm energy. We touched her thighs and stroked her hair and face. As dad held her, we verbally reminded her to relax into each contraction, not to fight or resist the work of her own body. I modeled to this mom how I wanted her to breath; slowly and deeply in through her nose and out through her mouth. Together we were able to help mom ride the stormy waves of the powerful contractions. For a short period mom used laughing gas to help calm and slow her breathing, but very quickly she was ready to push.
In no time at all, at 7:36 am a sweet little 6lbs. 12 oz. baby girl emerged slippery wet, yet so calm! She was placed next to the warmth of her mother's chest and we all soaked in the magic of this moment as a new live enters our presence.
Having experience a highly medicalized and managed first birth, it was so nice to hear the parents comment afterwards that this was the way to have a baby, "nice and normal".
Nice to see someone putting their money where their mouth is.Author Sean Taylor refused to accept his half of 32,500 pound prize money after winning the 2007 Nestle Children's Book Prize. Taylor's picture book, When a Monster Is Born, illustrated by Nick Sharratt, took the Gold Award in the under-fives category. Taylor cited "questions surrounding Nestle's marketing of breast-milk substitutes" in his refusal to accept the money. He said: "When a Monster is Born is a book that has something to do with choices. Some of these choices seem to be life-giving and some of them seem to take life away. I hope that I have made a life-giving choice. I have decided to refuse this check and ask that it goes back where it came from." www.thebookseller.com/news/49893-author-refuses-nestl-prize-cheque.html, 14 Dec 2007
Common ingredient in infant formula linked to diarrhea, severe dehydration, and seizures in babies, according to complaints submitted to the FDA
A shocking report has been released on the adverse health effects of fatty acids found in infant formulas. On Friday the Cornucopia Institute, a U.S.-based corporate watchdog group, presented their findings on the fatty acids DHA and ARA, which are now commonly added to formula.
The report is based on a Freedom of Information Act request that the Cornucopia Institute filed with the Food and Drug Administration, the result of which was the uncovering of 98 reports filed by parents and physicians detailing incidences when babies had reacted adversly to formula containing DHA/ARA. The reported incidences range from cases of vomitting and diarrhea that stopped when babies switched to non-DHA/ARA formula to babies being treated in intensive care units for severe dehydration and seizures.
The FDA has never been convinced of the safety of DHA/ARA additives, according to the report. In its initial analysis of the additives, the FDA stated it had reached no determination on their safety status. The administration also noted that some studies had reported unexpected deaths among infants who had been fed with DHA/ARA formula. Despite its reservations, inexplicably the FDA did not withhold approval for the additives.
INFACT Canada has long questioned the use of DHA and ARA (also marketed as omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids) in infant formula. All major formula companies have added the fatty acids to their products in recent years, claiming that they aid in brain and eye development. However most test results have found the additives have negligable effects on infant development. But because DHA and ARA are found naturally in breastmilk, formula companies market DHA/ARA formula as “closer to breastmilk.”
Martek Biosciences Corporation, the company which supplies almost all formula companies with DHA/ARA, has admitted that the purpose of the additives is not to encourage healthy development, but to be used as a marketing tool. In its promotional material to encourage investment, Martek has stated:
“Infant formula is currently a commodity market, with all products being almost identical and marketers competing intensely to differentiate their product. Even if [DHA/ARA] has no benefit, we think it would be widely incorporated into formulas, as a marketing tool and to allow companies to promote their formula as “closest to human milk.”
While DHA and ARA are found naturally in breastmilk, the idea that Martek’s manufactured acids make formula closer to breastmilk is ridiculous. Martek produces DHA and ARA from fermented algae and fungus, and uses hexane (a neurotoxin) in the manufacturing process. Simply adding these synthetic substances to formula cannot make artificial baby milk behave like breastmilk, which is a complex, living substance that provides babies with the best possible nutrition and immunological protection.
Regular infant formula puts babies’ health at risk, but now infants are being harmed for the sake of a marketing tool. This is an egregious case of formula companies putting profit margins above infant health. In light of this report, it is imperative that all parents be made aware of the potential risks of feeding their babies formula with DHA/ARA. The products should be pulled from the market until their safety can be properly assessed by independent investigations.
Babies should not have to get sick just because companies want to raise their sales figures.
For the more information on the Cornucopia report, please see: http://foodconsumer.org/7777
/8888/C_hildren_amp_W_omen_33 /012510002008_Lab-made_imitatio n_breast_milk_puts_infants_at _risk_study_shows.shtml For the full report, see: http://cornucopia.org/DHA/DHA
_FullReport.pdf